Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Alteration of CSF flow has been proposed to be an important mechanism leading to the development of syringomyelia. We hypothesize that a “presyrinx” condition attributable to a potentially reversible alteration in normal CSF flow exists and that its appearance may be caused by variations in the competence of the central canal of the spinal cord.
METHODS: Five patients with clinical evidence of myelopathy, no history of spinal cord trauma, enlargement of the cervical spinal cord with T1 and T2 prolongation but no cavitation, evidence of altered or obstructed CSF flow, and no evidence of intramedullary tumor or a spinal vascular event underwent MR imaging before and after intervention that alleviated obstruction to CSF flow.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, all patients had enlarged spinal cords and parenchymal T1 and T2 prolongation without cavitation. Results of MR examinations after intervention showed resolution of cord enlargement and normalization or improvement of cord signal abnormalities. In one patient with severe arachnoid adhesions who initially improved after decompression, late evolution into syringomyelia occurred in association with continued CSF obstruction.
CONCLUSION: Nontraumatic obstruction of the CSF pathways in the spine may result in spinal cord parenchymal T2 prolongation that is reversible after restoration of patency of CSF pathways. We refer to this MR appearance as the “presyrinx” state and stress the importance of timely intervention to limit progression to syringomyelia.
Syringomyelia occurs in a number of clinical settings, most commonly after trauma (1–3) or in association with a Chiari malformation (4–7). Other causes include infectious or inflammatory arachnoiditis (7–11), tumors of the spine and spinal cord (7), posterior fossa tumors (12), and cervical spondylosis (13). Syrinxes typically appear as well-defined discrete cavities containing fluid that is isointense with CSF on all sequences (14, 15). The pathophysiology of syringomyelia is controversial, but experimental models (16–18) and clinical studies (19) have implicated alterations in CSF flow as a significant factor in the development and progression of certain types of syringomyelia. The hypothesis that CSF normally flows along perivascular spaces within the parenchyma of the spinal cord to the central canal is supported by experimental studies (20–25). Variations in patency of the central canal of the spinal cord have been associated with the development of different types of syringomyelia (18, 26) and most likely play a role in determining the location of a syrinx remote from a focus of CSF obstruction, such as is commonly seen in the Chiari I malformation. The reversibility of syringomyelia after restoration of CSF pathways has been well documented in patients undergoing posterior fossa decompression for Chiari malformations, removal of extradural masses, and lysis of adhesions (9, 12, 27).
We have identified five myelopathic patients with no history of spine trauma who had underlying conditions associated with alterations of CSF flow. These patients had enlargement and T2 prolongation of the spinal cord, without frank cavitation, on MR imaging studies that improved or reversed after restoration of CSF flow pathways. We hypothesized on the basis of historical, imaging, and surgical findings that obstruction to normal CSF flow pathways resulted in the cord enlargement and MR signal abnormalities that reversed after restoration of normal CSF pathways. We also hypothesized that variation in patency of the central canal of the spinal cord plays a role in the genesis of this “presyrinx” state.
Methods
Over a 2-year period, five patients who met the following criteria were identified prospectively: clinical evidence of myelopathy, no history of spinal cord trauma, enlargement of the cervical cord with parenchymal T1 and T2 prolongation but no frank cavitation, and no evidence of intramedullary tumor or a spinal vascular event as the cause of cord signal changes. No patient had evidence of active inflammatory or demyelinating disease or received steroid therapy. In addition, all patients had obstruction to CSF flow at the level of the foramen magnum or the spinal epidural or subarachnoid space as evidenced by historical and/or imaging findings. Our patients included two males and three females and ranged in age from 2 to 77 years. Clinical records and imaging studies for these patients were reviewed.
All patients underwent preoperative imaging on a 1.5-T MR system. Imaging sequences included conventional spin-echo T1-weighted images (500/14 [TR/TE], 4 mm thick, 256 × 256 matrix) and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images (3000/105eff, echo train length of 8, 3 mm thick, 256 × 256 matrix) obtained in the sagittal plane in addition to axial T1-weighted images. A proton density–weighted sequence was not obtained, since it is not part of our routine spine imaging protocol. Contrast-enhanced images were obtained in three patients and included sagittal and axial T1-weighted sequences. MR examinations were conducted on all patients after surgical intervention and included, at a minimum, sagittal T1-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences. In addition, one patient underwent CT myelography preoperatively, and one patient underwent CT myelography postoperatively. Only one patient had an MR flow study performed preoperatively, using a cine phase-contrast technique (24/minimum [TR/TE], flip angle of 30°, 256 × 128 matrix, flow compensation and peripheral gating applied, velocity-encoding gradient = 5 cm/s) to evaluate CSF flow at the foramen magnum.
Results
A summary of our patients' histories, as well as clinical and imaging findings, is presented in the Table. All patients underwent MR imaging of the cervical spinal cord to evaluate myelopathic symptoms, although in one case (patient 1) headaches were the dominant clinical feature. The clinical presentations were similar to that of patients with central cystic myelopathy (7, 28), including increasing loss of motor function or weakness in all patients, sensory changes in two patients, increased spasticity in two patients, and radicular pain in one patient. The conditions that predisposed our patients to alterations in CSF flow dynamics and myelopathy included the following: Chiari I malformation with severe tonsillar herniation; previous osteomyelitis complicated by epidural abscess, meningitis, and arachnoiditis; basilar arachnoid adhesions related to previous head trauma, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, and posterior fossa surgery; subarachnoid hemorrhage complicated by meningitis, leading to severe hydrocephalus and tonsillar herniation; and rheumatoid arthritis with severe cervical spondylosis and spinal stenosis accompanied by basilar impression. In all five cases, the lesion occurred in the cervical spinal cord.
Results of preoperative MR imaging revealed a variable degree of enlargement of the cervical cord in all patients. All patients had abnormal T1 and T2 prolongation of the cervical spinal cord signal extending over a variable distance. The T1 signal was not as low as CSF in any case, and the margins of the T1 signal abnormality were not sharply defined. No frank cavitation was observed in any patient. Mild parenchymal enhancement of the upper cervical cord was observed in one case; this patient had no evidence of an acute clinical decline or systemic infectious or inflammatory condition, and her CSF profile was benign.
Evidence of a discrete level of obstruction to normal CSF flow was detected preoperatively in all but one patient. Patient 1 (Fig 1) had a Chiari I malformation with markedly narrowed CSF spaces at the level of the foramen magnum; a cine phase-contrast CSF flow study showed markedly restricted flow of CSF through the foramen magnum. Patient 2 (Fig 2) underwent preoperative CT myelography that showed a decreased flow of contrast material around a swollen cervical spinal cord and a myelographic block at the C3–C4 level caused by a large ventrolateral osteophyte and possibly adhesions as well; subtle increased density of the cord on delayed images was also found. Patient 4 (Fig 3) had a markedly enlarged fourth ventricle and tonsillar herniation that resulted in obstruction to flow at the level of the foramen magnum. Patient 5 had multilevel spondylostenosis and marked compression at the level of the foramen magnum caused by basilar impression and atlantoaxial subluxation. In all these cases, the level of obstruction was rostral to the level of cord signal changes. The level of obstruction in patient 3 was not clear preoperatively; this patient had a history of previous posterior fossa surgery and basilar adhesions that were most likely causing obstruction to flow at the level of the foramen magnum, but he also had a mild congenital spinal stenosis with superimposed acquired stenosis at the C5–C6 and C6–C7 levels. In this case, it is unclear whether the spinal cord signal changes were only caudal or both rostral and caudal to the level of obstruction to CSF flow.
Four of five patients underwent surgical intervention directed at restoring patency of CSF pathways. Patient 3 (Fig 4) underwent laminectomy and intradural exploration for placement of a syringopleural shunt, but this procedure was aborted because no syrinx was found (see below). Procedures performed are summarized in the Table. Only patient 3 underwent intraoperative sonographic evaluation of the spinal cord. Postoperatively, all patients experienced clinical improvement to varying degrees.
Postoperative MR imaging was performed in all patients from 1 week to 1 year after surgery. In all cases, the postoperative images showed a reduction in cord caliber, as well as improvement or resolution of T1 and T2 signal abnormalities. One patient (patient 3, Fig 4) experienced a subsequent deterioration in his clinical status after having had some improvement in clinical and imaging findings in the immediate postoperative period after lower cervical laminectomy and myelotomy. A second postoperative image 6 weeks after surgery showed an increase in central parenchymal T2 prolongation. No definite evidence was found for recurrent CSF obstruction at the surgical level, but the cord remained deformed at the level of the foramen magnum, and it was considered likely that obstruction to normal CSF flow remained at the foramen magnum level that had not been addressed surgically; a cine phase-contrast CSF flow study was not performed at this time, because this sequence was unavailable at the rehabilitation hospital where the patient was imaged. No further intervention was undertaken after that study for psychosocial reasons, and the patient was reexamined by his neurosurgeon 10 months later, because of symptom progression. A third postoperative study at this time revealed progression to frank syrinx formation. At this time, a syringopleural shunt was easily placed, but the patient experienced only minimal symptomatic improvement.
Discussion
The understanding of the pathogenesis of syringomyelia has been advanced by the important pathologic studies of Milhorat et al (7, 27, 28). On the basis of detailed histopathologic findings, they distinguished among three types of spinal cord cavities: 1) dilatations of the central canal that communicate directly with the fourth ventricle (communicating syrinxes); 2) noncommunicating dilatations of the central canal that arise below a syrinx-free segment of spinal cord; and 3) extracanalicular syrinxes that originate in the spinal cord parenchyma and do not communicate with the central canal. By correlating with clinical parameters, they were able to associate these distinct cavitary patterns with different mechanisms of pathogenesis. Communicating syrinxes were found in association with hydrocephalus and were caused by obstruction of CSF circulation distal to the outlets of the fourth ventricle. Noncommunicating syrinxes were associated with disorders of CSF dynamics in the spinal subarachnoid space, such as the Chiari I malformation, cervical spinal stenosis, basilar impression, and arachnoiditis. Extracanalicular or parenchymal syrinxes were typically found in the watershed area of the spinal cord, associated with conditions that cause direct injury to spinal cord tissue, such as trauma, infarction, and hemorrhage. Additionally, they found that concentrically enlarged central cavities (as are seen with communicating or noncommunicating syrinxes) either were asymptomatic or were associated with bilateral, nonspecific neurologic findings, such as spasticity, weakness, and segmental pain.
The theory that noncommunicating syringomyelia is related to alterations in CSF flow has received experimental support. The findings of several groups of investigators (20–22, 24) have shown in animal models that, under normal circumstances, CSF flows from the spinal subarachnoid space into perivascular spaces of the spinal cord and, from there, along the interstitial spaces toward the central canal. This net unidirectional flow is hypothesized to be driven by both pulsatile and bulk mechanisms (23), although it is unclear whether the impetus to flow is actual arterial pulsations within the spinal cord or the transmission of intracranial arterial pulsations to the CSF in the spinal subarachnoid space. Both accentuation of arterial pulsations during systole as well as redirection and accentuation of CSF pulsations transmitted through the subarachnoid space are theorized to account at least in part for the formation and expansion of cysts in noncommunicating types of syringomyelia, although additional experimental work is necessary to investigate these hypotheses. The role of adhesive arachnoiditis in syrinx formation has also been investigated experimentally (17). Subarachnoid block caused by adhesive arachnoiditis may initiate the formation or enlargement of a syringomyelic cavity, perhaps by redirecting and/or accentuating transmission of the force of systolic arterial pulsations.
The development of noncommunicating syringomyelia, or focal central canal dilatation remote from the site of CSF obstruction, may relate to variations in the patency of the central canal among individuals. The findings of Milhorat et al (7) showed that noncommunicating syrinxes were defined rostrally as well as caudally by stenosis of the central canal. An autopsy study of 232 patients without spinal cord abnormalities by this same group (29) indicated that stenosis of the central canal correlates with the age of the patient. Varying degrees of stenosis were present at one or more levels in 3% of infants under 1 year of age, 88% of adolescents and young adults (ages 13 to 29 years), and 100% of those over age 65. They concluded that the frequency and extent of central canal stenosis in humans almost certainly affects the clinical features of syringomyelia. Theoretically, a disturbance of CSF circulation in the spinal subarachnoid space redirects fluid through the interstitial spaces of the spinal cord and eventually into a patent segment of the central canal. Focal obliteration of the central canal above this level prevents communication between the syrinx and the fourth ventricle, initiating the conditions required for establishment of noncommunicating syringomyelia.
Clinical studies also support the importance of CSF flow patterns and subarachnoid space pressure waves in the initiation and propagation of syringomyelia. Oldfield et al (19) studied seven patients with Chiari I malformations and syringomyelia using MR imaging and intraoperative sonography. On the basis of their observations, they suggest that the development and progression of noncommunicating syrinxes associated with the Chiari I malformation are caused by obstruction to the normal rapid to-and-fro movement of CSF across the foramen magnum by tonsillar ectopia and the ventral position of the lower brain stem. During systole in the Chiari I malformation, brain expansion is accommodated by abrupt caudal movement of the tonsils. This downward, pistonlike systolic tonsillar movement can be shown on direction-sensitive cine phase-contrast MR sequences (Fig 1C). Rapid downward tonsillar movement, perhaps in concert with the deposition of fourth ventricular CSF into the spinal subarachnoid space below the level of obstruction, imparts an accentuated systolic pressure wave into the upper cervical spinal canal, forcing CSF into spinal cord parenchyma during systole. Oldfield et al (19) believed that their hypothesis might explain the origin and progression of noncommunicating syrinxes associated with the hindbrain malformations, as well as with other conditions that obstruct CSF flow in the spinal subarachnoid space, such as arachnoiditis and extramedullary tumors.
Syringomyelia is commonly observed in the posttrauma setting (1–3). In the case of trauma, the inciting event for syrinx formation is focal cord injury, although the propagation of a posttraumatic syrinx may certainly be related at least in part to alterations in CSF flow (30). In trauma patients, a condition termed progressive posttraumatic myelomalacic myelopathy (PPMM) has been described that is considered to represent a continuum of interrelated disease processes that may precede formation of a confluent cyst (31). Patients with PPMM are generally clinically indistinguishable from those with cystic myelopathy, and, in some cases, have been reported to have a microcystic myelopathy (30–35). The presence of localized arachnoiditis at the level of trauma leading to spinal cord tethering is considered to play an important role in the pathophysiology of PPMM, related at least in part to changes in local CSF dynamics (30, 31). Analogous to the situation of PPMM, our patients had myelopathic symptoms associated with conditions that predisposed them to syrinx formation, and, on MR images, had cord abnormalities without definite syrinx formation. To our knowledge, this has not been documented in patients without a history of trauma.
Specifically, the underlying conditions in our patients included Chiari I malformation, cervical spondylostenosis, and arachnoiditis, all of which are associated with both impedance to normal CSF flow and syrinx formation. All of our patients had nonspecific myelopathic symptoms, similar to patients with noncommunicating syringomyelia described by Milhorat et al (28), and had findings on MR images similar to those seen in cases of progressive posttraumatic myelomalacic myelopathy (31), including cord enlargement and T1 and T2 prolongation, with the T1 signal not as low as that of CSF and not sharply marginated. In the distinction between cystic and noncystic myelopathy, proton density–weighted images may be useful, since a cyst would be expected to be isointense with CSF whereas myelomalacic or microcystic changes would likely be hyperintense (36); however, proton density–weighted images may not be completely reliable, since a cyst may be hyperintense relative to CSF on a proton density–weighted image because of dampened CSF pulsations or a slightly elevated protein content. In addition, with the advent of fast spin-echo imaging of the spine, double-echo spin-echo sequences have been dropped from many imaging protocols, and we do not perform them routinely at our institution. Axial T1-weighted images may also be useful in the distinction of cystic from noncystic changes. Intraoperative sonography is certainly a useful adjunct in the assessment of cystic versus noncystic myelopathy (31, 34, 37, 38), but the performance of this examination varies among institutions and among individual surgeons and requires surgical exposure.
Findings strongly supporting disturbance of CSF flow were observed on preoperative imaging studies in four of our five patients, and the surgical procedures performed were either directed at restoring patency of CSF pathways or had that end effect in all patients. We do not have direct information on the status of the central canal in our patients, but we hypothesize that it was not patent, and, thus, CSF that was driven into the spinal cord parenchyma by alterations in normal flow patterns was unable to enter the central canal to form a syrinx (Figs 5 and 6). After improvement or reconstitution of CSF pathways, all patients experienced stabilization or improvement in clinical symptoms. Additionally, results of postoperative MR examinations showed both a reduction in cord caliber and an improvement in cord parenchymal signal abnormalities. Whether the signal alterations represent edema or microcystic change or both is unclear, since pathologic specimens are not available from these patients. A direct traumatic injury to the cord does not seem to be a necessary prerequisite for the development of this condition. A difficulty with this hypothesis is explaining the later development of frank cavitation in patient 3; however, it is possible that partial recanalization of the central canal may have occurred, followed by paracentral dissection around a stenotic segment (29). Alternatively, the myelotomy performed during the initial surgery may have created a pathway along which a syrinx could form and then extend.
Jinkins et al (39) recently described three patients with clinically progressive posttraumatic syringomyelia in whom extensive MR signal change on T2-weighted images in the spinal cord superior to a well-defined syrinx was found to be an ancillary sign of disease progression. After shunting of the syrinx, the parenchymal T2 hyperintensity resolved, and neurologic deficits stabilized or improved. They postulated that the T2 hyperintensity represented fluid escaping from the cyst or edema caused by as yet undefined pathologic alterations in the spinal cord adjacent to the cyst. In these cases, a definite obstruction to flow of CSF was not described, and the intervention taken (syrinx shunting) was not aimed at restoring patency of CSF pathways. It is possible that the enlarged cord caused relative obstruction of normal CSF flow pathways, resulting in a “presyrinx” condition cranial to the already formed syrinx cavity.
In further support of our hypothesis, the reversibility of cord signal abnormality associated with obstruction to normal CSF flow has been reported in a case of acquired tonsillar herniation caused by probable spontaneous intracranial hypotension (40–42). In this case, the cervical cord was enlarged and had T1 and T2 prolongation without frank cavitation, consistent with the presyrinx state. After spontaneous resolution of the patient's condition (presumably because of closure of an occult CSF leak), the cerebellar tonsils returned to a normal position, and the cervical cord caliber and signal reverted to normal. The patient was not myelopathic but did experience occipital and neck pain. The lack of myelopathic symptoms is not inconsistent with presyrinx physiology, since even patients with frank syringomyelia (typically of the central cavitary type) may be asymptomatic (28).
Because surgical intervention was performed that restored or improved CSF flow pathways in all our patients, we are unable to prove that they would have progressed to frank syrinx formation. The implication that syrinx formation would have occurred if the patients were left untreated is justified by the following three considerations: first, the underlying conditions in our patients all have a known association with syringomyelia; second, in one patient (patient 3) who initially responded to surgical intervention with marked improvement in cord enlargement and signal abnormality, clear-cut syrinx formation occurred during the follow-up period, presumably because the underlying obstruction to CSF flow had not been fully addressed by the surgical procedure performed; and third, the recent observations of Jinkins et al (39), which suggest that reversible T2 changes were considered to predict frank syrinx formation. We, therefore, propose the use of the term “presyrinx” state as a valid concept to describe these and similar cases.
We have also considered other possible causes of the reversible cord enlargement and T2 prolongation identified in our patients. It seems unlikely that arterial ischemia plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of the presyrinx state based on the fact that the imaging abnormalities did not conform to a vascular territory and were reversible as assessed by postoperative imaging. Venous ischemia could have played a role in cord enlargement and signal changes, analogous to the pathophysiology of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, but no abnormal veins were identified at preoperative imaging or intraoperatively. The lack of identification of macroscopic abnormal veins does not, however, exclude a role for venous ischemia. In the setting of trauma, occluded intramedullary veins have been identified in degenerated segments of spinal cord (43). In the nontraumatic setting, it is possible that pressure changes in the epidural venous plexus in association with disturbances of CSF circulation lead to an increase in spinal venous pressure and accumulation of fluid in the spinal cord (12). Venous ischemic changes are also known to be reversible. However the venous drainage of the spinal cord is quite rich, and the mechanism by which venous ischemia would have occurred in our patients is not clear. Therefore, although we propose that the presyrinx state is fundamentally one of altered CSF flow parameters, we do recognize that a contribution of venous ischemia may be present as well and that sorting out these relationships will require further study.
The relationship between the level of the block to CSF flow and the location of the presyrinx lesion also warrants consideration. As most of our patients had high cervical or foramen magnum blockages to CSF flow, it is not surprising that the spinal cord parenchymal signal changes that we observed developed caudal to the block. Pathophysiologically, this is most likely related to fluid entering the cord below the level of the block and then tracking cephalad in cord parenchyma and/or the central canal to circumvent the block; however, in the experience of Jinkins et al (39), which we consider an analogous situation, the presyrinx lesion extended rostral to the level of obstruction. In the setting of trauma, syrinxes most commonly extend superiorly from the site of injury, although superior and inferior extension, and even inferior extension alone, have been observed. This may relate to the fact that the cervical cord expands more easily than the thoracic cord (3, 9, 44).
An important but as yet unexplained aspect of this phenomenon is why we do not see these MR findings more frequently in cases of Chiari I malformations and basal arachnoiditis, as these are not uncommon conditions. Because patients in the presyrinx state may have minimal clinical symptoms or even be asymptomatic, they may not come to medical attention until frank cavitation and more severe symptoms have developed. Additionally, a dynamic balance between CSF pressure in the spinal subarachnoid space and the spinal cord parenchyma may exist, and the anatomic conditions required to establish the presyrinx state may occur only rarely. For instance, the establishment of this state may depend on the morphology and extent of the network of spinal perivascular spaces and the capacity and patency of the central canal, among other factors. Intervention at an appropriate time may allow restoration of normal flow patterns and reversal of parenchymal signal abnormalities, as well as improvement in neurologic deficits. That this entity may represent an equilibrium state is supported by the documentation of this appearance in one of our patients (patient 2) for some time before she progressed symptomatically to the point that surgical intervention was performed. Further study will be necessary to better understand normal and abnormal spinal subarachnoid fluid circulation and the pathophysiology of syrinx formation.
Conclusion
We have described a condition of reversible spinal cord enlargement and T1 and T2 prolongation, the “presyrinx” state, which occurs in the setting of CSF flow obstruction and may be misinterpreted as syringomyelia on MR studies. Surgical intervention aimed at restoring patency of CSF pathways is likely to be of benefit in these patients, and MR findings should guide selection of the procedure to be performed. This entity presumably represents a point on the continuum to development of syringomyelia and may be pathophysiologically related to variations in the patency of the central canal and also to the entity of progressive posttraumatic myelomalacic myelopathy.
Footnotes
↵1 Address reprint requests to Nancy J. Fischbein, MD, Department of Radiology, Box 0628, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143.
References
- Received March 10, 1998.
- Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology